What criterion should Brian disregard when determining the reliability of his internet sources?

When evaluating the reliability of internet sources, one criterion that should be disregarded is whether Brian agrees with all the information provided. This is important because the main focus of assessing a source's reliability hinges on its credibility, accuracy, and the quality of evidence rather than individual bias or personal agreement with the content.

It is essential to consider factors such as the intended audience, the presence of cited sources, and the website's domain, as these elements contribute significantly to determining the trustworthiness of the information. A source aimed at a scholarly audience is likely to be more rigorous than one aimed at the general public. Citing sources demonstrates that the information is backed by research or expert opinions, further indicating reliability. Additionally, domains such as .gov, .org, or .edu typically suggest a higher level of credibility due to the nature of their content and the organizations behind them.

Thus, personal agreement with the information should not be a criterion for reliability; instead, focus should remain on the objective qualities of the source.